Grading guideline
|
EVALUATION CRITERIA
|
%
|
1
|
work skills (personalized)
completion of tasks*) quality of online research, correct citation and referencing of sources quality of comments & feedback use of language (understandable), images & presentation of work self-evaluation & reflexive skills
social skills
respect, collaboration (group work, peer teaching)
initiative & active participation
Positive attitude, enthusiasm & commitment creativity and ideas in general
|
50
|
2
|
Quality of project implementation (team's product) (e.g. website contribution on www.dontwastemy.energy)
- Ideas, concept, originality
- Organisation steps, time plan, deadlines
- Your research and preparations (links to materials, drafts, reports, contacts, e-mails, etc.)
- Communication, transparency, fairness (teacher, team members, between teams)
- Product:
Content: Quality/correctness of text, calculations, etc. Media: Quality of photo, video, sound Traceability (Nachvollziehbarkeit: Used and/or linked materials and sources, quality of data sources, up-to-dateness Specials: Does the website contribution astonish, give new insights (T&U)? Is it understandable? (e.g. relation to reality/daily life/examples)
|
30
|
3
|
Online tests and/or presentations (personalized)
|
20
|
|
Total
|
100
|
Qualification range
A - Excellent fulfillment of given tasks (>5.75-6)
B - Very good fulfillment of given tasks (5.25-5.74)
C - Good fulfillment of given tasks (4.75-5.24)
D - Satisfactory fulfillment of given tasks, room for improvement (4.0-4.74)
E - Huge range for improvement/fulfillment of given tasks is not satisfactory (<4.0)
Your personal assessment will be in your private section of the wkvw class OneNote (you need a login to the wkvw Office365). More Info here (The giant Horse)